SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AADIL @ NAUSERWA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


CRL.A. 1105/2019

Page 1 of 12

#

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Order reserved on: 15.07.2022

Order delivered on: 03.08.2022

+

CRL.A. 1105/2019, CRL.M.(BAIL) 1690/2019

AADIL @ NAUSERWA

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr.Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate

(DHCLSC).

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for State with

PSI Abhishek.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

O R D E R

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

CRL.M.(BAIL) 1690/2019

1. An application has been filed on behalf of the appellant under Section

389 Cr.P.C. for suspension of sentence. The appellant has been convicted

vide judgment dated 15.05.2019/17.05.2019 in FIR No.289/16 registered at

PS: Khajuri Khas, Delhi under Section 377/506/34 IPC and Section 6 of

POCSO Act and acquitted of charge under Section 363/34 IPC.

The appellant has been further sentenced under Section 506 IPC to

undergo RI for one year and fine of Rs.5,000/- (in default of payment of fine,

to undergo SI for 15 days); for the offence under section 6 POCSO Act to RI

for a period of 10 years and fine of Rs.20,000/- (in default of payment of

D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top