SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUNIL SUD & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
AJAY SUD – Respondent


ARB.P. 341/2021

Page 1 of 9

$~4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

ARB.P. 341/2021

SUNIL SUD & ANR.

..... Petitioners

Through

Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Adv.

with Ms. Fareha Ahmad Khan, Ms. Shagun

Chopra and Mr. Akash Panwar, Advs.

Versus

AJAY SUD

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Nikhil Y. Chawla and Mr. Vikas

Mishra, Advs. for R-3

Mr. Nirmal Prasad, Adv. for R-5/Axis Bank

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C .HARI SHANKAR

O R D E R (ORAL)

%

19.04.2021

(video-conferencing)

C .HARI SHANKAR, J.

3.

The facts stated in the petition, giving rise to the disputes

ARB.P. 341/2021

1.

Mr. Akhil Sibal, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent,

submits that he has no objection to the disputes in this petition being

referred to arbitration.

2.

The stakes are stated to be in the area of around ₹ 14 crores to ₹

15 crores, though Mr. Ashisk Dholakia, learned Senior Counsel for the

petitioners, submits that they may be higher.

Digitally Signed

By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI

Signing Date:26.04.2021

07:59:12

Signature Not Verified

ARB.P. 341/2021

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top