SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JIMBLE MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


BAIL APPLN. 646/2018 Page 1 of 3

$~7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

DECIDED ON : 7th MAY, 2018

+

BAIL APPLN. 646/2018 & CRL.M.A.No.5503/2018

JIMBLE MATHEW

..... Petitioner

Through :

Mr.Rohit Bharadwaj, Advocate.

Versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through :

Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP with SI Seema,

PS New Friends Colony.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

S.P.GARG, J. (Oral)

1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR

No.415/2016 registered under Section 376 IPC at PS New Friends

Colony. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have

examined the file. Petitioner’s counsel urged that a false FIR has been

lodged by the prosecutrix. Both the petitioner and the prosecutrix

were acquainted with each other and lived consensually in a live-in-

relationship. Subsequently, the complainant started picking up

quarrels and committed physical and mental torture to the petitioner.

The complainant suspected the petitioner and used to regularly check

his phone / call details and messages. The petitioner, th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top