SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ARUN BHARDWAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


BAIL APPLN. 743/2018

Page 1 of 5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Decided on: 20th April, 2018

+

BAIL APPLN. 743/2018

ARUN BHARDWAJ

..... Petitioner

Represented by:

Mr. Ajay Burman, Senior

Advocate with Mr. Kunal

Malhotra and Mr. Atul Sahi,

Advocates.

versus

STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Represented by:

Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP

for the State with SI Ashok

Ahlawat, PS Vikaspuri.

Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior

Advocate with Mr. Vivek

Sharma and Mr. Anshul Garg,

Advocates for complainants.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

MUKTA GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

1.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.

600/2016 under Sections 420/406/120B IPC registered at PS Vikas Puri,

Delhi on the complaint of Kuldeep Singh.

2.

Allegations in the above noted FIR on the complaint of Kuldeep

Singh are that he registered himself with Franchise India Pvt. Ltd. (in short

‘FIPL’) to find out a business/investment opportunity where he was

introduced to alleged M/s. Sera Cue Labs Pvt. Ltd. (in short ‘Sera Cue’) and

its pathology lab business who had given an advertisement in “The

Franchise Wor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top