SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MR. KAPIL NAGAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


$~4

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 31.07.2019

+

BAIL APPLN. 876/2019 & Crl.M.B.635/2019

MR. KAPIL NAGAR

..... Petitioner

Versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner :

Ms.Sonia Mathur, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Vishal Kumar,

Mr. Sushil Kr.Dubey, Ms.Noor Rampal and

Ms.Divya Nair, Advs.

For the Respondent

:

Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP, Addl. PP for the State

with Insp.Vinay Kumar, P.S.ATO/Khajoori Khas.

Mr.Pradeep Teotia, Adv. for the complainant.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.74/2019 under

Section 306 IPC, Police Station Khajuri Khas.

2.

Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of the brother of

the deceased. It is alleged that there was a dispute between the co-

accused and the family of the deceased. FIR alleges that the co-

accused Tushar Bansal, his father Pushpender Bansal and the

petitioner were troubling the family of the deceased including the

deceased. It is alleged that there was a monetary transaction between

the family of the deceased and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top