SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


CRL. A. 140/2016

Page 1 of 9

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 25.11.2019

+

CRL.A. 140/2016 & CRL.M.(BAIL) 1604/2019

RAMESH

..... Appellant

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellant:

Mr Dinesh Malik, Advocate (DHCLSC).

For the Respondent:

Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State.

CORAM

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

JUDGMENT

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

1.

The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment

dated 15.12.2015 passed by ASJ, FTC, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts,

whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section

326A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for throwing acid and

causing burn injuries to two persons. The appellant also impugns the

order on sentence dated 16.12.2015, whereby the appellant was

sentenced to ten years of rigorous imprisonment and was imposed a fine

of ₹35,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he was sentenced to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for a further period of six months.

CRL. A. 140/2016

Page 2 of 9

2.

The appellant contends that the Trial Court failed to appreciate

that there are contradictions in the testimonies of PW2 and PW4, which

raise doubts as to the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top