HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ASHWANI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE – Respondent
CRL.A.-155/2016
CRL.A. 155/2016 Page 1 of 7
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 20th April, 2017
Decided on: 25th May, 2017
+
CRL.A. 155/2016
ASHWANI KUMAR
..... Appellant
Represented by:
Mr. Krishan Kumar and Ms.
Sunita Arora, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE
..... Respondent
Represented by:
Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the
State with ASI Om Prakash, PS
Hauz Khas.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
1.
Convicted for offences punishable under Section 307 IPC and Section
25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Ashwani Kumar challenges the impugned
judgment dated 31st October, 2015 and the order on sentence dated 23rd
November, 2015 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
period of four years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for offence punishable
under Section 307 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years
for offence punishable under Section 25 of the Arms Act.
2.
Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for Ashwani Kumar submits
that the recovery of knife is highly improbable and is not admissible under
Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act. The alleged recovery of knife is also not
admissible because it was recovered from an open place accessible to all and
sundry and this fact has been admitted by PW-10 Constable Anil Kumar in
CRL.A. 155/2016 Page 2 of 7
his testimony. Reliance is placed upon the decision of Division Bench of this
Court reported as 2014 SCC OnLine Del 7126 Heera Lal @ Heera v. State
of NCT of Delhi. It was further submitted that nature of injury cannot be
ascertained when there is no mention about the dimension of the injury in the
MLC. Mere mentioning of 'grevious' in the MLC without dimension is not
enough to convict the appellant for offence punishable under Section 307
IPC. The arrest of Ashwani Kumar is also doubtful. Hence the appellant be
acquitted.
3.
Learned APP for the State on the other hand submits that the
impugned judgment of conviction and order on sentence suffer from no
illegality. Appellant was apprehended at the spot. The knife was recovered
from the heap of garbage.
4.
Process of law was set into motion on 23rd September, 2013 when
three DD entries were received at PS Hauz Khas. DD No. 50A received at
11:35 P.M. stated about a quarrel at C-106, Panchsheel Park which was
assigned to PW-9 Constable Pritam. DD No. 56A was also received at 11:35
P.M. informing about a quarrel near Verma Paranthewala behind AIIMS
which was assigned to PW-14 SI Babu Ram. DD No. 57A was received
around 11:40 P.M. informing that the caller has been stabbed by a knife by
some boys behind Sudarshan Cinema at Gautam Nagar. The said entry was
assigned to PW-8 HC Harkesh. When PW-14 SI Babu Ram along with PW-
9 Constable Pritam reached the spot at Gautam Nagar, they found the injured
Keshav Saini PW-1 with an injury on the right side of his chest. Keshav
pointed out towards the two boys on the motorcycle who had assaulted him
with a knife. On seeing the police, those two boys tried to flee away
however, they were apprehended by the police. In the meantime, Keshav was
CRL.A. 155/2016 Page 3 of 7
sent to AIIMS hospital for medical examination. Names of the two boys
were revealed as Ashwani Kumar and Manish Tiwari. Both the accused
persons were also taken to the hospital for medical examination. FIR No.
398/2013 was registered under Sections 307/34 IPC at PS Hauz Khas on the
statement of SI Babu Ram. Motor cycle bearing No. DL3S BZ 8866 was
seized by SI Babu Ram. Blood stained clothes of Keshav and blood sample
of accused persons were sent to FSL for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.