SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.

1. The present batch of appeals arise from the judgment and order of the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act), (CBI), Rohini dated

16.01.2013 convicting the appellants in the following terms by way of order on sentence dated 22.01.2013.

ccused No. Name of Accused Criminal Appeal No. Conviction Maximum Sentence (In Years)
1. Vidya Dhar, IAS 346/2013 Section 120-B IPC r/w Section  418/467/471 IPC rw Section 13(2) PCAct 10
2. Sher Singh Badshami 340/2013 Section 120-B IPC r/w Section  418/467/471 IPC rw Section 13(2) PCAct 10
3. Sanjiv Kumar, IAS 277/2013 Section 13(2) rw 13(1)(d) PC  Act Section 120-B IPC r/w Section  418/467/471 IPC rw Section 13(2) PCAct 10
4. Om Prakash Chautala 213/2013 Section 13(2) PC Act rw  13(1)(d) PC Act Section 120-B IPC r/w Section  418/467/471 IPC rw Section 13(2) PCAct 10
5. Ajay Singh Chautala 334/2013 Section 120-B IPC r/w Section  418/467/471 IPC rw Section 13(2) PCAct 10
32. Madan Lal Kalra (Kurukshetra) 246/2013 Section 13(2) PC Act  Section 418 IPC, Section 467  IPC and Section 471 IPC Section 120-B IPC

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top