SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
KHURSHEED – Respondent


CRL.A. 510/2018

Page 1 of 59

$-

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment reserved on: 11.07.2018

%

Judgment delivered on: 07.08.2018

+

CRL.A. 510/2018

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Mr.

Rajat Katyal, APP with Insp. Ajay

Kumar, ASI Tuli Ram, PS Badarpur

versus

KHURSHEED

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms.

Mallika

Parmar,

Advocate

DHCLSC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI

J U D G M E N T

VIPIN SANGHI, J.

1.

The State has preferred the present appeal upon grant of leave to assail

the judgment dated 24.11.2016 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge-01, South East District, New Delhi in Case No. 1808/ 16, Sessions

Case No. 209/ 13, arising out of FIR No. 369/ 2013 registered at Police

Station- Badarpur under Sections 376 IPC and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

CRL.A. 510/2018

Page 2 of 59

2.

By the impugned judgment, the Trial Court has acquitted the

Respondent/ Accused- Khursheed, inter alia, on the premise that the

testimony of the prosecutrix was untrustworthy due to various improvements,

contradictions and inconsistencies

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top