CRL A. 965/2017

Page 1 of 6

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

CRL. Appeal 965/2017

MANOJ KUMAR

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr Manish Kumar, Mr Ravindra

Samueal and Ms Sanjeeta Tripathi,

Advs

versus

STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms Neelam Sharma, APP with SI R.S.

Pandit

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1

Appellant Manoj Kumar has filed the present appeal. He had

appeared on the production warrant. He is a convict along with co-accused

Satish Kumar. Both the appellants have been convicted under Section 392

r/w 120B IPC. Appellant Manoj Kumar was separately convicted under

Section 397 IPC as well. The appellant had been sentenced to undergo RI

for a period of 7 years as also to pay a fine of Rs 5000/- and in default of

payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of three months. As on

20.11.2017 the appellant has undergone incarceration of 1 year and 13 days

meaning thereby that as on date he has undergone incarceration for almost

CRL A. 965/2017

Page 2 of 6

15 months which would include the remission earned by him. His jail

conduct is sat