SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT KUMAR & ORS – Appellant
Versus
CHARU MAKIN – Respondent


CRL.M.C. 1755/2016

Page 1 of 6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Decided on: 28th March, 2017

+

CRL.M.C. 1755/2016 and Crl. M.A. No. 7418/2016

AMIT KUMAR & ORS

..... Petitioners

Represented by:

Mr. Prashant Mendiratta and

Mr. Anirudh K. Mudgal,

Advocates.

versus

CHARU MAKIN

..... Respondent

Represented by:

Ms. Shradha Karol, Amicus

Curiae with respondent in

person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

MUKTA GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

1.

The respondent filed a complaint case being CC No. 217/4/2014 under

Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

(in short ‘PWDV Act’) before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate inter alia

seeking restraint against the petitioner from approaching or visiting the

house of the respondent or her workplace and restraining him from

committing any act of domestic violence. Prohibition was also sought

against the petitioner from having any access to the minor child or coming to

school of the child or to any other place where the minor child went for her

extracurricular activity and also prohibiting the petitioner from removing the

minor child from the custody

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top