SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV KUMAR GOEL – Appellant
Versus
NEETA AGGARWAL THRU LEGAL GUARDIAN/MOTHER & ANR. – Respondent


$~29

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: July 29, 2015

+

CRL.M.C. 3008/2015

SANJEEV KUMAR GOEL

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Arvind Pandey, Advocate

versus

NEETA AGGARWAL THR. LEGAL GUARDIAN/ MOTHER &

ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Karan Singh, Additional

Public Prosecutor for respondent-

State with ASI Ravinder Singh

Mr. Dinesh Sabharwal, Advocate

with respondent No.1 in person

and her legal guardian/mother

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

JUDGMENT

% (ORAL)

Quashing of FIR No.53/2014, under Sections 328/342 of IPC

registered at police station Crime Branch, Delhi is sought on the basis of

affidavit of Smt. Urmil Aggarwal, who is the legal guardian/mother of

respondent No.1-Neeta Aggarwal.

Notice.

Mr. Karan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for

respondent-State accepts notice and Mr. Dinesh Sabharwal, Advocate,

accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1, who submits that Smt. Urmil

Aggarwal, who is the mother of respondent No.1, has been appointed

Legal Guardian of respondent No.1 by the Family Court.

Learned Additional Public Prosecuto

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top