SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ARVIND KEJRIWAL & ORS – Appellant
Versus
AMIT SIBAL & ANR – Respondent


Crl. M.C.5245/2013 Page 1 of 25

$~1

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.M.C. 5245/2013 and Crl.M.A.Nos.18920-21/2013

%

Date of Decision : 16th January, 2014

ARVIND KEJRIWAL & ORS

..... Petitioners

Through :

Mr. Shanti Bhushan, Sr.

Adv. with Mr. Rahul Mehra,

Mr. Rohit Singh, Mr. Kartik

Seth,Mr. Rishikesh Verma

and Ms. Neha Rastogi,

Advs.

versus

AMIT SIBAL & ANR

..... Respondents

Through :

Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv.

with Mr. Madhav Khurana

and Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh,

Advs. for R-1.

CORAM :-

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. Respondent no.1 instituted a complaint of defamation

against the petitioners under Sections 500 and 501 read with

Sections 34 and 120B of IPC in which, vide summoning order

dated 24th July, 2013, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate issued

summons to the petitioners.

2. The petitioners have challenged the summoning order dated

24th July, 2013 on the ground that respondent no.1 is not the

Crl. M.C.5245/2013 Page 2 of 25

aggrieve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top