SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
BABLI PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE AND ANR. – Respondent


Crl. Rev. P.187/2015

Page 1 of 4

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

Crl. Rev. P.187/2015

BABLI PANDEY ….Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Dheeraj Kumar Nayal, Advocate.

Versus

STATE & ANR. ..Respondent

Through:

Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the

State with SI Raghuveer, PS-Bindapur.

Mr. Jai Gopal Garg, Advocate for the

respondents No. 2 to 4.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

1.

The present Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under

Section 397(1)/401/482 Cr.PC assailing the order dated 03.11.2014

passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-04, South West, Dwarka

New Delhi in CR No. 61/14 whereby respondents No. 2 to 4 were

discharged

for

the

offence

punishable

under

Sections

341/506/509/34 IPC.

2.

The brief and necessary facts which emerges from record is that

when the petitioner/complainant was returning home, the

respondents No. 2 to 4 obstructed her way, used filthy language

and extended threat to her to which she replied that they were

mentally harassing her and they will face dire conse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top