*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Decided on: 23^rd September, 2016

+

CRL.REV.P. 351/2016 & Crl.M.A. 7747/2016

DINESH PURI

..... Petitioner

Represented by:

Ms. Kumud L. Das with Mr.

Kulbhushan Mehta and Mr.

Brijender Singh, Advs.

versus

STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Represented by:

Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with

SI Yogesh Raj, PS Prashant

Vihar.

Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Adv. for

R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

MUKTA GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

1.

The petitioner was summoned as an accused pursuant to charge sheet

filed in case FIR No. 1138/2015 and vide order dated 22^nd March, 2016

charge for offences punishable under Sections 354A/354D IPC and Sections

10 and 12 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act was

framed against him.

2.

The grievance of the petitioner is two folds. Firstly, that he filed an

application under Section 207 Cr.P.C. however without deciding the said

application, the learned Trial Court framed charge as noted above vide order

dated 22^nd March, 2016 and secondly, vide order dated 11^th April, 2016

dismissed the said application granting him liberty to