SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DEEPAK BAJPAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. – Respondent


CRL.REV.P. 685/2017 & CRL.M.A. 15058/2017 Page 1 of 18

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Order: 27th October, 2017

+

CRL.REV.P. 685/2017 & CRL.M.A. 15058/2017

1. DEEPAK BAJPAI

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Prashant Mehdiratta, Adv. with

Mr.Harshwardan, Mr.Mohd. Irsad and

Ms.Aanchal, Advs.

versus

1. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

2.

ARUN JAITLEY

..... Respondents

Through:

Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State

Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with

Mr.Manik Dogra, Mr.Anupam

Prasad and Mr.Manoj Taneja, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

ORDER

I.S. MEHTA, J.

1.

Instant application, i.e. CRL.M.A. 15058/2017, under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act

for condonation of delay of 458 days in filing the present

revision petition has been filed by the petitioner-Deepak Bajpai.

CRL.REV.P. 685/2017 & CRL.M.A. 15058/2017 Page 2 of 18

2.

Brief

facts

as

stated

are

that

the

respondent

No.2/complainant, i.e. Arun Jaitley, had filed a complaint under

Section 200 Cr.P.C. a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top