DELHI HIGH COURT
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANT LAL SHARMA & ORS. – Respondent
FAO No. 392/2016 Page 1 of 9
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
FAO No. 392/2016
%
25th September, 2017
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Rudra Kahlon, Adv.
versus
SANT LAL SHARMA & ORS.
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Radheshyam Singh, Adv.
for R-1 and 2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA
To be referred to the Reporter or not?
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)
FAO No. 392/2016 & C.M. Nos. 29625/2016 (for stay) and
7408/2017 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC)
1.
This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees
Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the insurance company,
respondent no.2 before the Employees Compensation Commissioner
below, impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation
Commissioner
dated
16.5.2016
by
which
the
Employees
Compensation Commissioner has allowed the claim petition filed by
the respondent nos. 1 and 2/claimants, legal heirs of the deceased Sh.
FAO No. 392/2016
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.