SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SANT LAL SHARMA & ORS. – Respondent


FAO No. 392/2016 Page 1 of 9

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

FAO No. 392/2016

%

25th September, 2017

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Rudra Kahlon, Adv.

versus

SANT LAL SHARMA & ORS.

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr. Radheshyam Singh, Adv.

for R-1 and 2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

FAO No. 392/2016 & C.M. Nos. 29625/2016 (for stay) and

7408/2017 (under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC)

1.

This first appeal under Section 30 of the Employees

Compensation Act, 1923 is filed by the insurance company,

respondent no.2 before the Employees Compensation Commissioner

below, impugning the judgment of the Employees Compensation

Commissioner

dated

16.5.2016

by

which

the

Employees

Compensation Commissioner has allowed the claim petition filed by

the respondent nos. 1 and 2/claimants, legal heirs of the deceased Sh.

FAO No. 392/2016

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top