HIGH COURT OF DELHI
DHOLI SPINTEX PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
LOUIS DREYFUS COMPANY INDIA PVT. LTD. – Respondent
I.A.-8685/2020
CS(COMM) 286/2020
Page 1 of 19
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 18th November, 2020
Decided on: 24th November, 2020
+
CS(COMM) 286/2020
DHOLI SPINTEX PVT. LTD.
..... Plaintiff
Represented by:
Mr.Nakul Dewan and Mr.Devang
Nanavati, Sr. Advocates with
Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Mr.Karan Luthra,
Ms.Prachiti Shah, Ms.Aarushi Tiku,
Ms.Anushka Shah, Mr.Sambit Nanda
and Mr.Dev Shah, Advocates.
versus
LOUIS DREYFUS COMPANY INDIA PVT. LTD...... Defendant
Represented by:
Mr.Jayant K. Mehta, Mr.Rakesh K.
Ojha, Mr.Sanjeev Sarawast,
Mr.Achintya Dwivedi, Mr.Surya
Kapoor, Mr.Pranay Chitale,
Mr.Ankush Chattopadhyay and
Mr.Arjun Parashar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
I.A. 8685/2020 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC-By plaintiff)
1.
In the above noted suit arguments were concluded by the parties on
24th September, 2020 when the suit was reserved for orders, whereafter the
plaintiff-Dholi Spintex Pvt. Ltd. (in short „Dholi Spintex‟) filed this
application seeking interim injunction inter-alia on the ground that the
defendant-Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt. Ltd (in short „Louis Dreyfus‟)
in utter disregard to the undertakings before this Court has been
clandestinely participating in the proceedings before the ICA despite having
made a statement before this Court that it is not required any further to
participate in the same and has virtually rendered the suit infructuous.
Digitally Signed By:JUSTICE
MUKTA GUPTA
Signing Date:24.11.2020
15:15:52
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 286/2020
Page 2 of 19
Therefore, Dholi Spintex prays for a temporary injunction restraining the
defendant-Louis Dreyfus from proceeding with and/or continuing with
and/or participating in any manner whatsoever in the proceedings referred to
as ICA Reference No.LOU005.0004/AO1 2020 24 initiated before the
International Cotton Association (in short „ICA‟) including making any
payments pursuant to the directions of the ICA in its email dated 24th
September, 2020.
2.
When this application came up before this Court on 28th September,
2020 this Court besides issuing notice in the application, passed the
following order issuing show cause notice to the Managing Director of the
defendant as to why proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act be not
initiated against him:
2020. However in the wake of a communication dated 24th
Digitally Signed By:JUSTICE
MUKTA GUPTA
Signing Date:24.11.2020
15:15:52
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 286/2020
Page 3 of 19
take no further action in the arbitration proceedings, till 9th
Digitally Signed By:JUSTICE
MUKTA GUPTA
Signing Date:24.11.2020
15:15:52
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 286/2020
Page 4 of 19
abide by the same.‖
the Arbitral Tribunal on 9th September, 2020. Thus, on 9th
order of this Court dated 1stSeptember, 2020.‖
Digitally Signed By:JUSTICE
MUKTA GUPTA
Signing Date:24.11.2020
15:15:52
Signature Not Verified
CS(COMM) 286/2020
Page 5 of 19
Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.‖
3.
Before proceeding to deal with the prayers in the present application
as also the show cause notice issued to the Managing Director of the
defendant, a brief background of the case is that pursuant to a contract dated
30th May, 2019 which provided in Clause-6 of the agreement that in case of
any dispute arising out of this contract, the same will be resolved through
arbitration in accordance with the ICA Rules and ICA procedure, venue of
the arbitration being London, Louis Dreyfus invoked the technical
arbitration before the ICA on 13th April, 2020 and appointed its nominee
arbitrator. On 29th April, 2020 ICA wrote to Dholi Spintex informing the
request for arbitration and asking Dholi Spintex to nominate its arbitrator in
14 days. Since Dholi Spintex failed to nominate its arbitrator, on 2nd June,
2020 ICA appointed the nominee arbitrator for Dholi Spintex being
Mr.David Adcroft. On 11th June, 2020 Louis Dreyfus fi