$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Decided on : 24.11.2015

+

LPA 155/2013

VARUN BHARDWAJ

………………Appellant

Through: Mr. Shanker Raju with Mr. Nilansh Gaur,

Advocates.

Versus

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

…………..Respondents

Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv

Kapur, Advocate, for SBI.

Mr. Vipin. K. Chilana, Professor (Psychometrics) and

Division Head, IBPS, Mumbai.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA

MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

%

1. This letters patent appeal is preferred by an unsuccessful writ

petitioner whose claim was rejected by a learned single judge in his

judgment dated 06.02.2013. The appellant had sought for a direction that the

results of his examination in the recruitment process/selection of candidates,

conducted by the State Bank of India (SBI), should be declared.

2. The appellant completed his Bachelor in Arts and applied for the

position of clerk in the SBI in September 2009 as a General Candidate. He

later received a call letter to appear in the written examination from SBI.

The appellant appeared in the written examination on 15.11.2009. He claims