SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
UPSRTC – Appellant
Versus
MEENA & ORS. – Respondent


MAC. APP. No. 1273/2012

$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

MAC.APP. No.1273/2012

UPSRTC

..... Appellant

Represented by: Mr. Shadab Khan,

Advocate.

Versus

MEENA & ORS.

..... Respondents

Represented by: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate

for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

SURESH KAIT, J.

1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated

14.08.2010 whereby, the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for

a sum of Rs.11,48,176/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum

from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Corporation

submitted that the learned Tribunal has erred in holding that the

respondents are the actual legal heirs of the deceased Gabruddin @

Jafruddin @ Mullah in absence of any documentary proof, in as much as,

MAC. APP. No. 1273/2012

there is no document on record to show that the deceased Gabruddin @

Jafruddin @ Mullah was Gaffar Khan.

3. It is submitted that in the post-mortem report Ex.PW2/5, name of

the deceased was mentioned as Jafruddin @ Gabruddin @ Mu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top