SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ROMESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RAKESH KUMAR & ANR. – Respondent


RFA No.888/2017 Page 1 of 14

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No.888/2017

%

24th October, 2017

ROMESH KUMAR

..... Appellant

Through: Mr. Vinay Sabharwal, Advocate.

versus

RAKESH KUMAR & ANR.

.... Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

C.M. No.37694/2017 (exemption)

1.

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

C.M. stands disposed of.

C.M. No.37692/2017 (for condonation of delay)

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 83 days

in filing the appeal is condoned.

C.M. stands disposed of.

RFA No.888/2017 and C.M. No.37693/2017 (stay)

3.

This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of Code of

Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit

RFA No.888/2017 Page 2 of 14

impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 28.1.2017 by which

the trial court has decreed the suit for possession filed by the

respondent no.1/plaintiff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top