SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAVINDER GULATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


`

TEST.CAS. 52/2018

Page 1 of 23

$~10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: 4thOctober, 2021

+

TEST.CAS. 52/2018

RAVINDER GULATI

..... Petitioner

Through:

Ms.

Shoba

Ramamoorthy,

Mr.

J.

Thalapathy Sriram, Mr. Shilp Vinod,

Ms. Vincy George and Mr. Nawaz

Sherif, Advocates.

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms.

Saumya

Tandon,

Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

JUDGMENT

[VIA HYBRID MODE]

SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral):

I.A. 1573/2021 (for determination of true value of the suit property for the

purpose of payment of Court fee filed by the Petitioner u/s. 151 of the

CPC, r/w Section 19H of the Court Fees Act, 1870 & Chapter 29 of the

Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018)

1.

By way of the instant application, the Petitioner seeks determination

of the ‘true value’ of the property bearing No. H-7, Maharani Bagh, New

Delhi [hereinafter referred to as,the suit property’] for payment of court

fee for grant of probate of a Will dated 8thJuly, 2008.

BRIEF FACTS

2.

Before dealing with the contentions of the parties, it is apposite to

Digitally Signed

By:SAPNA SETHI

Signing Date:22.10.2021

20:20

Signature Not Verified

`

TEST.CAS. 52/2018

Page 2 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top