HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
BABLU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./11860/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11860 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2020 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
Bablu Singh S/O Sitaram Singh R/O Village Chandpur, P.S-Shahkund
(sajaur), District-Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Pravin Kumar Sinha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umanath Mishra, App
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
3
17-08-2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties through video
conferencing.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of
regular bail in connection with a case registered under sections
363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegations in the F.I.R, the daughter of the
informant who had gone to the college did not return and was
not to be found inspite of search. The informant suspects that
she was kidnapped.
It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner that the F.I.R. was registered after a delay of six days
without any reasonable explanation for the same. The victim
returned and her statement was recorded under sections 161 and
164 Cr.P.C. which are at variance with each other. It is
submitted that the statement under section 164 Cr.P.C made
after three days is a tutored statement. Further, from perusal of
the medical report her age was estimated to be more than 18
years, no injury was found on her body nor any spermatozoa
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11860 of 2021(2) dt.17-08-2021
2/2
was found. The petitioner is in custody since 14.6.2020,
investigation in the case has concluded and he has no criminal
antecedent.
Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking
into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case
including the allegation against this petitioner by the daughter of
the informant in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C, the
Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the
application is rejected.
Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
Prakash/-
(Partha Sarthy, J)
U