PATNA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR MANJHI – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 3544/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3544 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2021 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran
======================================================
Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Manjhi Son of Premchand Manjhi Resident
of Village- Badauli, P.S.- Baniapur, District- Saran (Chapra).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Satyendra Kumar Singh
Mr. Hari Shankar Roy
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendraa Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2
10-08-2022
The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to
remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within
one month.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences
alleged under Sections 376, 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code
and Sections 4, 6, 8 of PACSO Act read with Section 67 I.T.
Act, registered in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No.
96/2021.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
that though the prosecutrix has stated in the FIR that accused
persons including the petitioner committed rape upon her after
kidnapping her, but the FIR was lodged after 5 days of the
occurrence on 2nd April 2021. The statement of the victim was
recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. on 13th August, 2021
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3544 of 2022(2) dt.10-08-2022
2/2
in which she denied the allegation of rape. She has stated that
none had committed rape upon her. Only they dropped her in
the house of Phua.
Considering the fact that the prosecutrix did not
support her version of rape in her statement under Section 164
of the Cr.P.C., let the petitioner above-named, in the event of
his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of
communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) within two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive
Special Judge, POCSO Saran (Chapra) in connection with
Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 96 of 2021, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the
petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove,
failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this
Court.
HR/-
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.