SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PATNA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
AJAY KUMAR RAI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent


Advocates:
['Raj Kumar', '', 'SHANTANU KUMAR', 'RAM CHANDRA SAHNI APP', '', 'DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.377 of 2012

======================================================

Ajay Kumar Rai S/O Late Ram Narayan Rai Resident Of Village-

Nayayipur, P.S.- Buxar (Mufassil), In the District of Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Bidya Sagar Pandey, son of late Chedi Pandey, Vill. Sukrwaliya, P.S.

Itadhi, Distt. Buxar.

.... .... Opp. Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opp. Party/s : Mr.

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

ORAL ORDER

4

27-04-2012

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel

for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

I.A. No. 659 of 2012 has been filed for condoning the

delay in filing of the present revision application. For the reasons

mentioned in the I.A., the delay in filing of the revision

application stands condoned. I.A. No. 659 of 2012 stands allowed.

This revision application is directed against the appellate

judgment and order dated 19.12.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top