IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6644 of 2016

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -262 Year- 2015 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN

======================================================

Govind Kumar Mishra Son of Late Parmeshwar Mishra, Resident of

Village - Mala, P.S. - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

.... .... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganjendra Kumar Singh, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar (App)

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN

SHARMA

ORAL ORDER

2

29-02-2016

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chapra

Town P.S. Case No. 262 of 2015 registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477(A) of

the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, the petitioner working in the accounts

section of Bihar Home Guard, Chapra got deposited the duty

allowance of five Home Guards in his own account in collusion

with Bank and when the matter came to light, the petitioner

deposited it back in the account of concerned Home Guards and

for this act, he has been debarred from the job till further order.

Submission is of false implication and that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6644 of 2016 (2) dt.29-02-2016

2/2

petitioner is poor Home Guard, he was not the accountant and he

has been made scapegoat, he has not committed any offence and

moreover no loss has been caused to anyone, the petitioner is

suffering in custody since 02.01.2016, having no criminal

antecedent and, as such, he deserves sympathetic consideration to

which the learned APP opposes.

In

the facts

and

circumstances

stated

above,

considering the detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be

released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra in connection

with Chapra Town P.S. Case No. 262 of 2015 subject to the

conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another

having sufficient immovable property within the territorial

jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain

present on each and every date during trial and the default on two

consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle

the petitioner from privilege of bail.

sushma/-

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)

U

T