SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Kumar Thakur and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
CWJC 16258/2018



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16258 of 2018

======================================================

1.

Krishna Kumar @ Krishna Kumar Thakur and

2.

Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Thakur. Both S/o Late Hari Nandan Thakur,

Resident of Village- Patsara, P.S.- Piyar, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, East Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Circle Officer, Bandra Anchal, District- Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Land Reform, Additional Collector, East Muzaffarpur, District-

Muzaffarpur.

6.

Ram Adhar Ram, S/o Jugeshwar Ram,

7.

Inarjit Paswan @ Indrajit Paswan, S/o Ganeshi Paswan.

8.

Jharilal Paswan @ Bhutti Paswan, S/o Birhati Paswan.

9.

Kaplu Paswan, S/o Mahendra Paswan.

10.

Raju Paswan, S/o Mahendra Paswan.

11.

Sheochandra Das, S/o Prasad Das.

12.

Prasad Das, S/o Chaitu Das.

13.

Kailasiya Devi @ Pabitari Devi, W/o Prasad Das.

14.

Sheo Deo Das, S/o Jagesar Das @ Jageshwar Das.

15.

Sheela Devi, W/o Sheo Deo Das.

16.

Pawan Das, S/o Surya Das @ Suraj Das.

17.

Bipin Das @ Bittu, S/o Sheo Deo Das.

18.

Ram Jatan Das, S/o Muneshwar Das

19.

Rajeshar Das @ Rajeshwar Das, S/o Muneshwar Das.

20.

Baidhyanath Das @ Baijnath Das, S/o Muneshwar Das.

21.

Tuntun Das, S/o Bahiru Das @ Ram Jatan Das.

22.

Fanish Kumar @ Chunnu, S/o Baidhyanath Thakur.

23.

Karpuri Das, S/o Ramdhari Das.

24.

Sanjay Sahni, S/o Mahesar Sahni @ Maheshwar Sahni, resident of Village-

Patsar, Tola Manipur.

25.

Cnansi Das, S/o Late Baleshwar Das.

26.

Parikshan Das @ Chandu Das, S/o Barhamdeo Das.

27.

Sharda Devi, W/o Parikshan Das.

28.

Rita Devi, W/o Tulasi Das.

Patna High Court CWJC No.16258 of 2018(2) dt.05-09-2022

2/2

29.

Tetari Devi, W/o Baidhyanath Das @ Baijnath Das, All resident of Village-

Patsara, P.S.- Piyar, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. D.K. Sinha, Sr. Addvocate

:

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy – GP18

:

Mr. Muku, Prasad, AC to GP 18

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

ORAL ORDER

2

05-09-2022

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

that the private respondents have constructed road over the

private land of the petitioners, however, considering the

well-settled law to the effect that private claims/ disputes cannot

be adjudicated in a writ petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, the learned counsel for the petitioners

seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to avail such other

alternative remedies as are available under the law. Liberty so

sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands disposed off.

rinkee/-

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top