HIGH COURT OF PATNA
AZHAR ANSARI @ MD. AZHAR ANSARI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC. 3242/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3242 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2021 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Azhar Ansari @ Md. Azhar Ansari S/o Islam Ansari @ Md. Islam Ansari
Resident of Village- Harina, P.S.- Obra, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21847 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2021 Thana- OBRA District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Nitish kumar Son of Umesh Singh R/o village - Harina, P.S.- Obra, District -
Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3242 of 2022)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Tej Narayan Singh
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21847 of 2022)
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3
06-12-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and
learned APP for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Obra
P.S. Case No. 221 of 2021, registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 420, 505, 34, 341, 323, 354 (B),
354(C), 354(D), 504, 506, 509 and 34 of the Indian Penal
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3242 of 2022(3) dt.06-12-2022
2/5
Code and 66(E), 66(D), 67, 67(A) of I.T. Act and 8/12 of
POCSO Act.
The prosecution case as emerging from the FIR is
that petitioner, namely, Nitish Kumar created a fake
Facebook account and posted obscene photos and videos of
the informant. Allegation of affixing the photos on the pole is
also there.
The learned counsel for the petitioner, namely,
Azhar Ansari submits that the petitioner is innocent and has
falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that
the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Even as per further
statement of the informant, his case stands on better footing
than that of Kundan Kumar and Luvkush Kumar who have
already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this
Court.
The learned counsel for the petitioner, namely,
Nitish Kumar submits that the petitioner is innocent and has
falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that
even in the FIR, the petitioner is not named as accused and
only as improvement, his name has transpired in further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3242 of 2022(3) dt.06-12-2022
3/5
statement of the accused which is not reliable. He also
submits that investigation in this case is complete and
charge-sheet has already been submitted. However, he is
not sure whether charge is framed or not.
It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition
that the petitioners have not moved earlier before this Court
for grant of anticipatory bail or regular bail.
It has further been stated in paragraph no. 3 of
the petition that the petitioner,namely, Azhar Ansari has no
criminal antecedent whereas the petitioner, Nitish Kumar has
earlier been made accused in one more case.
However, the learned APP for the State
vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners for bail.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,
the petitioner, namely, Azhar Ansari, is directed to be
released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of
Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the Ld. Concerned Court
Below in connection with Obra P.S. Case No. 221 of 2021
on the conditions given hereunder.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3242 of 2022(3) dt.06-12-2022
4/5
However, petitioner, namely, Nitish Kumar, is
directed to be released o