IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4284 of 2021

======================================================

Syed Arif Hussain Son of Md. Mokimuddin Secretary, Dargah Sharif Jalki

Waqf No. 2683/ Katihar, Resident of Village- Jalki, P.S.- Azamnagar, District-

Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

The District Magistrate Katihar.

3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police Katihar.

4.

The Sub- Divisional Officer Barsoi, Katihar.

5.

The Sub- Divisional Police Officer Barsoi, Katihar.

6.

The Circle Officer Azamnagar, Katihar.

7.

The Circle Inspector Azamnagar, Katihar.

8.

The Officer Incharge Azamnagar Police Station, Katihar.

9.

The Revenue Staff Azamnagar, Katihar.

10.

The Circle Nazir Azamnagar, Katihar.

11.

The Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board Through its Chief Executive Office, 2nd

Floor, Haj Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station-

Sachivalya, District- Patna.

12.

The Chairman Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, 2nd Floor, Haj Bhawan,

Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station- Sachivalya, District- Patna.

13.

The Chief Executive Officer Bihar State Sunni Wakf Board, 2nd Floor, Haj

Bhawan, Harding Road, Ali Imam Path, Police Station- Sachivalya, District-

Patna.

14.

Syed Rahat Alam Son of Shafique Resident of Village- Jalki, Police Station-

Azamnagar, District- Katihar.

15.

S.M. Ali Asgar Son of Abdul Hasmat Resident of Village- Jalki, Police

Station- Azamnagar, District- Katihar.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

NONE

For the State

:

Mr. Mukul Prasad, AC to GP 18

For Res. Nos. 14 & 15

:

Mr. Rashid Izhar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

ORAL ORDER

3

04-09-2021

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press

this writ application. However, learned Counsel for the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.4284 of 2021(3) dt.04-09-2021

2/2

and learned Counsel for the respondent nos. 14 and 15 are

present.

On the last occasion also, no one had appeared on

behalf of the petitioner to press this writ application.

Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed for

default.

Prabhakar Anand/-

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)

U

√