SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PATNA HIGH COURT - PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
NIWASH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 5382/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5382 of 2020

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2019 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai

======================================================

1.

Niwash Yadav Son of Hareram Yadav

2.

Birbal Yadav S/o Pappu Yadav

3.

Dharambir Yadav S/o Bodho Yadav

All resident of Village- Mansoorchak, P.S.- Ballia, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner

:

Mr.Arjun Prasad, Advocate

For the Opposite Party

:

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

ORAL ORDER

3

30-06-2020

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection

with Ballia P.S. Case No.170 of 2019 for offences under

Sections 323, 307, 386 and 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents and

there is no specific over act alleged against the petitioners

It is alleged that on account of soil filling work, the

petitioners and others demanded Rangdari tax.

From the materials available on record it appears that

the allegation of demand of Randari tax and assault is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5382 of 2020(3) dt.30-06-2020

2/2

against the petitioners. The case of the petitioners is that they

engaged their tractor to M/s Om Construction for completion of

construction work and the dispute over payment of fare of

tractor arose in the present case.

Considering the aforesaid, this Court is inclined to

grant bail to the petitioners. Let petitioners, above-named, in the

event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees

twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai

in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No.170 of 2019, subject to

the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

and subject to further condition that on release, the petitioners

shall render their services as volunteers in the District Health

Centre for a period of one month in dedicated Covid hospital.

They are required to report the District Nodal Officer in the

concerned region who shall utilise the services of the petitioners

appropriately.

BT/-

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top