HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Rajesh Gautam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 3081/2020
['Binay Kumar Singh', '', 'Kumar Rajeev', 'JITENDRA KUMAR', 'RAJ KISHORE ROY GP']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3081 of 2020
======================================================
Rajesh Gautam, Son of Ramji Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Rarha, P.O.-
Rarha, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Land Reform and Revenue Department, Govt. of
Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Collector, Patna.
4.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Masaurhi, Patna.
5.
The Executive Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna.
6.
The Circle Officer, Dhanarua, Masaurhi, Patna.
7.
The Officer In-Charge, Dhanarua, Police Station, Patna.
8.
Amresh Ravidas, Son of Late Sitaram Ravidas, resident of Village- Rarha,
P.O.- Rarha, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna.
9.
Suresh Ravidas, Son of Late Sitaram Ravidas, resident of Village- Rarha,
P.O.- Rarha, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna.
10.
Sailesh Ravidas, Son of Late Sitaram Ravidas, resident of Village- Rarha,
P.O.- Rarha, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Binay Kumar Singh
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
ORAL ORDER
2
26-09-2022
The present writ petition has been filed
seeking the following relief:-
“1. That this is an application for
issuance of an appropriate writ, order or
direction commanding the respondents
for removing the encroachment done by
the private respondents i.e. respondent
no. 8 to 10 bearing Mauza-Rarha, Thana
No. 110, Tauzi No. 6343, Khata No. 126,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3081 of 2020(2) dt.26-09-2022
2/3
Plot No. 638, Area in total 21 decimals
from North to South 100 ft. and from
east to west 40 ft. which is aam
gairmazarua rasta used by petitioner and
others as common road, Executive
Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna already held
and ordered to remove under proceeding
133 Cr.P.C. dated on 8.8.2017, in survey
the land also denotes as aam rasta, the
petitioner filed several representation
raising points but till date no action has
been taken and / or for any other order
or orders as your Lordships may deem fit
and proper in the facts and
circumstances of this case.”
At the outset, the learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner
to approach the Circle Officer, Dhanarua, Masaurhi
District-Patna for redressal of his aforesaid
grievance.
Liberty so sought is granted.
It is needless to state that in case the
petitioner approaches the Circle Officer, Dhanarua,
Masaurhi District-Patna by filing appropriate
petition under the provisions of the Bihar Public
Patna High Court CWJC No.3081 of 2020(2) dt.26-09-2022
3/3
Land Encroachment Act, 1956, within a period of
four weeks from today, the same shall be
considered, in accordance with law and after
hearing the affected parties, appropriate orders
shall be passed thereon, forthwith.
The writ petition stands disposed off on the
aforesaid terms.
Ajay/-
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
U