SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Bindu Kumari and Anr – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
CWJC 18799/2014



Advocates:
['Swapnil Kumar Singh', 'SC AJEET KUMAR', '', 'Sanjay Pandey']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18799 of 2014

======================================================

1.

Bindu Kumari, D/O Kailash Kumar, resident of village- Sinduri, P.S.-

Amarpur, District- Banka

2.

Sangita Kumari, D/O Bhavesh Mandal, resident of Moury Nagar Colony,

P.S.- Mirjanhar, District- Bhagalpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home (Police), Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3.

The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department (Personnel

Administrative Reforms Department), Bihar, Patna

4.

The Central Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, Patna, through its

Secretary

5.

The Chairman of Central Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, Patna

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

None

For the Respondents No.4 & 5

:

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate

Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate

Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR)

3

05-12-2022

None appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel for the Central

Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, is present.

3. Earlier also, when the matter was taken up on

02.12.2022, none had appeared to represent the case of the

petitioners. It is needless to say that the matter relates to

selection of the Constable for that advertisement was issued way

Patna High Court CWJC No.18799 of 2014(3) dt.05-12-2022

2/2

back in 2009.

4. Considering the fact that none has appeared to

represent the case of the petitioners, the present writ application

stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

J. Alam/-

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

(Harish Kumar, J)

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top