SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAUTAM SAURAV – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
['Sanjeev Kumar', 'Shyameshwar Dayal', '', 'Amritya Raj', 'Mayank Shekhar', 'Saket Gupta']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8567 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2021 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya

======================================================

Sautam Saurav, S/O Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Prasad R/O

Village- Dirawan, P.S.- Cherki, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal

Mr. Saket Gupta

Mr. Mayank Shekhar

Mr. Amritya Raj

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

ORAL ORDER

2

02-09-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State through

video conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in

a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328,

302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

alleges that on 04.07.2021 at about 8.00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top