SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
LAL BIHARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. REV. 999 2008



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CR. REV. No.999 of 2008

LAL BIHARI SINGH

Versus

STATE OF BIHAR

-----------

2

10.9.2008

This revision application has been preferred against the

judgement dated 30.6.2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge,

Fast Track Court No.1, Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 1995,

Tr.No.107 of 2005 thereby the order of conviction and sentence dated

6.9.1995 passed by Sri A.K.Thakur, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,

Danapur in Complaint Case No. 471©89 Trial No.1603/95 has been

confirmed.

The learned Magistrate vide judgment dated 6.9.1995 has

convicted the petitioner and one other under Sections 323 and 324 of

the Indian Penal Code and sentenced the petitioner to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section

323 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment for one year

under Section324 of the Indian Penal Code.

This application is heard on the point of sentence only.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that

this is a case of the year 1989.Both parties are Gotias amongst

themselves. There was land dispute between the parties. In such

circumstance, the court below ought to have released the petitioner

under the provisions of Probation of Offenders Act. He has wrongly

awarded substantive sentence to the petitioner.

Considered the submission of learned counsel for the

petitioner. Perused the impugned judgment.

- 2 -

The occurrence took place in the year 1989. The petitioner

has already been harassed for about nineteen years. He has been found

guilty only under Sections 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code

under which punishment prescribed is much less than seven years.

There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view

that the petitioner deserves benefit of provisions of Probation of

Offenders Act.

Accordingly, sentenced awarded to the petitioner is hereby

set aside. The petitioner, namely, Lal Bihari Singh, is directed to be

released under Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act on furnishing

probation bond of Rs.2000/- (Two thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each the satisfaction of the satisfaction of Sri A.K.

Thakur, Judicial Magistratek, 1st Class, Danapur in Complaint Case

No. 471©/1989 for maintaining peace and be of good behaviour for a

period of one year. The petitioner is directed to furnish probation bond

within fifteen days of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid modification in sentence, this application

is rejected.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the court below through

FAX on the cost to be deposited by the petitioner.

B.Jha

(Ghanshyam Prasad)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top