SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Smt. Naincy Jaiswal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
['Santosh Kumar', '', 'NIRANJAN KUMAR', 'UDAY SHANKAR SHARAN SINGH -GP', '', 'Siddhartha Prasad']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14632 of 2018

======================================================

Smt. Naincy Jaiswal wife of Sri Ajit Kumar, resident of Village- Deoria,

P.O.+ P.S.- Deoria, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction

Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Superintending Engineer, North Bihar Road Division, Muzaffarpur.

3. The Executive Engineer, Road Division, Road Constructin Department,

Muzaffarpur.

4. The Assistant Engineer, Road Division, Muzaffarpur.

5. The Junior Engineer, Road Division, Muzaffarpur.

6. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

7. The District Arms Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

8. The Circle Officer,

9. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited represented through its Territory

Manager (Retail), Muzaffarpur.

10. The Deputy Manager, Sales Retail, Muzaffarpur Territory, Bharat

Petroleum Corporation Limited, P.O.- MIT, Bela, Muzaffarpur.

11. The Duly Constituted Attorney, TM (Retail), Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s

=======================================

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top