HIGH COURT OF PATNA
NAGENDRA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 10267/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10267 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2021 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj
======================================================
NAGENDRA PRASAD Son of Devnath Prasad Resident of Village-
Chamanpura, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar
2.
The Vigilance Investigation Bureau,Bihar, Panta, 6 Circular Road, Road,
Patna Patna.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2
06-09-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467,
468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant
alleges that petitioner secured appointment as teacher based on
forged and fabricated marksheet.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is
next submitted that this Court had given animosity to those
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022
2/3
teachers who had sought appointment on forged and fabricated
certificate and had barely directed that such teachers should
resign within a time frame but since petitioner was aware and
was knowing that this certificate are not forged and fabricated as
such he continued, it is next submitted that petitioner had
appeared in his matriculation examination with Roll Code No.
09216 in the year 1990, as such it cannot be alleged that
petitioner had sought appointment on forged and fabricated
certificate.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions and specific averments
made in the anticipatory bail application by the learned counsel
for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his
arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period
of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court
in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No. 273 of 2021
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of
the Cr.P.C.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022
3/3
In the event, if police after investigation submits
charge-sheet against the petitioner then the present anticipatory
bail order shall lose its effect.
Shivam/-
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
U
T