SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
NAGENDRA PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 10267/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10267 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2021 Thana- SIDHWALIYA District- Gopalganj

======================================================

NAGENDRA PRASAD Son of Devnath Prasad Resident of Village-

Chamanpura, P.S.- Baikunthpur, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar

2.

The Vigilance Investigation Bureau,Bihar, Panta, 6 Circular Road, Road,

Patna Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA

ORAL ORDER

2

06-09-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467,

468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant

alleges that petitioner secured appointment as teacher based on

forged and fabricated marksheet.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is

next submitted that this Court had given animosity to those

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022

2/3

teachers who had sought appointment on forged and fabricated

certificate and had barely directed that such teachers should

resign within a time frame but since petitioner was aware and

was knowing that this certificate are not forged and fabricated as

such he continued, it is next submitted that petitioner had

appeared in his matriculation examination with Roll Code No.

09216 in the year 1990, as such it cannot be alleged that

petitioner had sought appointment on forged and fabricated

certificate.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions and specific averments

made in the anticipatory bail application by the learned counsel

for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his

arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period

of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on

furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court

in connection with Sidhwaliya P.S. Case No. 273 of 2021

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of

the Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2022(2) dt.06-09-2022

3/3

In the event, if police after investigation submits

charge-sheet against the petitioner then the present anticipatory

bail order shall lose its effect.

Shivam/-

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top