HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Raushan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 3263/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3263 of 2022
======================================================
Raushan Kumar S/o Umesh Singh Resident of Village - Sathe, P.S. - Roh
District- Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
2.
The Divisional Commissioner, Excise Department, Patna Division, Patna.
3.
The District Collector, Nawada.
4.
The Superintendent of Police, Nawada.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Kumar Manish (S.C. 5)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR)
(The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the
Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.)
Date : 22-04-2022
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
Patna High Court CWJC No.3263 of 2022 dt.22-04-2022
2/4
Allegation is recovery of 1.5 litres of illicit liquor
from the bag of the petitioner.
Petitioner claims to be the owner of the said vehicle.
It is further submitted that a meagre quantity of 1.5
of liquor has been recovered from the bag of the petitioner, as
such, it cannot be construed that the vehicle was used for
transporting/carrying illicit liquor.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the District
Magistrate/Confiscating Officer concerned is directed to
provisionally release the vehicle of petitioner after due
identification of ownership of the vehicle seized by the police in
excise case on production of ownership and registration papers
with respect to vehicle in question in his name with two sureties
(one local) to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated
in the insurance document.
The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also
furnish the following affidavits/undertakings:
(i) That the petitioner shall not indulge in
creating any third party right or interest in respect of the
vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding
and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.
(ii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to
produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as
and when required.
(iii)Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama
would be prepared wherein the photograph of the vehicle
shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and
Patna High Court CWJC No.3263 of 2022 dt.22-04-2022
3/4
same shall be kept on record so that in future if so required,
it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner
shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said
Panchanama.
The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days
from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings
as stated above, which would however be subject to finalization
of the confiscation proceeding.
OR
It is submitted on behalf of counsel for the State that
during pendency of writ petition, there has been amendment in
the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 and a new Rule
12(A) has been inserted which reads as under:-
“12. A. Release of Vehicles, Conveyance etc. on
payment of Penalty:- (1) If any vehicles, conveyance, vessel,
animal etc. has been seized by any police or excise officer under
the Act, then in terms of section -57B(1) of the Act, the Collector
or an officer authorized by him upon receipt of an application in
Form IV by the owner of the said conveyance or vehicle etc.,
may release the said conveyance or vehicle upon payment of
such penalty as may be ordered by the Collector or the officer
authorized by him.
Provided, where it is not possible to ascertai