PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
RASH BIHARI CHOUDHARY @ RASHBIHARI – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. WJC/258/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.258 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2021 Thana- HATHAURI District- Samastipur
======================================================
Rash Bihari Choudhary @ Rashbihari Son of Arun Kumar Choudhary
Resident of Village - Ram Bhadrapur, P.s.- Hathauri (Shivaji Nagar O.P.),
Distt.- Samastipur, State - Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar
2.
The Principal Home Secretory, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar
3.
The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. Bihar
4.
The Seperintendent of Police, Samastipur. Bihar
5.
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rosera. Bihar
6.
The Officer in charge, Hathauri P.S., Samastipur. Bihar
7.
Md. Nizam Ali Son of Md. Basir Ali Resident of Village - Ram Bhadrapur,
P.s.- Hathauri (Shivaji Nagar O.P.), Distt.- Samastipur, State - Bihar.
8.
Md. Mustafa Ali Son of Md. Basir Ali Resident of Village - Ram Bhadrapur,
P.s.- Hathauri (Shivaji Nagar O.P.), Distt.- Samastipur, State - Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Lalit Kishore(A.G), App
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN
SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN
SINGH)
3
24-06-2022
This application has been filed seeking issuance of a
writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing the State-
Respondents particularly respondents No. 4 to 6 to produce the
petitioner’s minor girl who, according to the petitioner, is in
custody of private respondents No. 7 and 8. Learned counsel
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.258 of 2022(3) dt.24-06-2022
2/2
appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the
victim is in the custody of said private respondents No. 7 and 8
who have kidnapped her for the purpose of marriage.
It is admitted position as asserted in the writ petition
itself that alleging that the victim is with private respondents no.
7 and 8. In such circumstance, in the court’s opinion, the prayers
seeking direction to the state-respondents to produce the girl
who is said to be minor by issuance of writ in the nature of
Habeas Corpus is misconceived. This application is accordingly
dismissed. It is to be noted that a criminal case has already been
instituted by the petitioner registered as Hathauri P.S. case No.
166 of 2021.
Gaurav Kumar/-
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
( Khatim Reza, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.