IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12267 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2018 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj

======================================================

PINTU KUMAR SINGH @ PINTU SINGH, Son of Late Brij Kishore Singh,

Resident of Village - Khajuri, P.S.- Kuchaikot, District - Gopalganj

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Vijay Kumar

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

ORAL ORDER

2

05-03-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP representing the State.

Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection

with Kuchaikot P.S. Case No. 309 of 2018/G.R.No.4629 of

2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 308,

323, 324, 341, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged that the son of the informant had plucked

flower from the door of the petitioner, for this reason the

petitioner had beaten him by fists and slaps. When the son of the

informant narrated the story to his mother, she went there to ask

the petitioner. It is alleged that the petitioner assaulted her and

pushed her due to which she fell down on the ground. At this

stage, when the informant rushed for her rescue, the accused

persons assaulted the informant. This petitioner is said to have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12267 of 2019(2) dt.05-03-2019

2/2

given a farsa blow upon the informant which caused injury over

the left ear and the blood started oozing out.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

entire prosecution version is a concocted story. It is stated that

the injury is simple in nature.

Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed

the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. It is stated that

the petitioner had used a deadly weapon and had caused injury

on the vital part of the body of the informant.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

particularly the use of farsa and causing injury on the vital part

of the body of the informant, I am not inclined to grant

anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer is refused.

In case, the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular

bail in the court below within a period of six weeks from today,

the same shall be considered on its own merit and on the basis

of the materials available on the record without being prejudiced

by the order of this Court.

arvind/-

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

U

T