HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
BALI KUMAR TANTI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./15279/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15279 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2021 Thana- Sohsarai District- Nalanda
======================================================
Bali Kumar Tanti Son of Nandu Tanti Resident of Village - Talabpar Asha
Nagar, P.S.- Sohsarai, Distt.- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binay Krishna, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
3
16-08-2022
Let the defect, if any, be removed within two weeks
from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 217 of 2021 lodged under Sections
354(A), 354(B), 354(C) I.P.C. read with Section 14 POCSO Act
and Section 67(B) I.T. Act and Section 3(i)(r)(s) SC/ST Act.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioner has
prepared the video of the informant and prepared semi-nacked
photograph and make it viral.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner’s family has given Rs. 2,00,000/- to the informant’s
family which they were not ready to return and upon demand
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15279 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022
2/3
they have filed the present case.
On merit he submits that case has been filed that
F.I.R. has been lodged under the provisions of Indian Penal
Code POCSO Act, SC/ST Act and I.T. Act but charge sheet has
been filed only under the provisions of Indian Penal Code and
Information Technology Act. He further submits that upon
medical the age of the girl was ascertained 18-19 years.
He further submits that petitioner has clean
antecedent, charge sheet has already been filed in this case and
he is in custody since 12.11.2021. His antecedent is clean.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for
bail but also submits that it is true that charge sheet has been
filed under I.P.C. and I.T. Act only.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and
the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be
granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees
Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of learned 7th Addl. Sessions Judge -Cum-
Special POCSO Court, Biharsharif, Nalanda in connection with
Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 217 of 2021, subject to the conditions as
laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following
conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15279 of 2022(3) dt.16-08-2022
3/3
A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall
appear physically before the lower court on each and every date
fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates
without sufficient cause, shall resulted into cancellation of his
bail bond.
B. One of the bailor shall be close relative who shall
file affidavit before the court about his relation with the
petitioner.
With this observation, the bail application stands
allowed.
sadique/-
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
U
T