HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
AKASH SHARMA @ CHHOTU – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./17580/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17580 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2021 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger
======================================================
Akash Sharma @ Chhotu, son of Late Ratan Sharma, resident of
village/Muhalla-Kasim Bazaar, P.S.-Kasim Bazar, District-Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2
15-07-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.
Bharat Bhushan, learned APP for the State through video
conferencing in view of the COVID-19.
Let the defect(s) be removed within four weeks of the
complete start of the physical Court in normal course.
The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection
with Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No.313/2021 instituted under
Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the
Arms Act.
The FIR as it unfolds is/are as follows:
(a) It is alleged in the First Information Report that six
years ago Deepika Sharma, sister of the informant had married
Ravi Kumar, brother of this petitioner and since her marriage all
family members of her in law’s house started harassing her.
(b) It is further alleged in the FIR that Bhubneshwar
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17580 of 2022(2) dt.15-07-2022
2/4
Sharma, Kundan Sharma and others the agnates of the informant
due to property dispute killed Nivedika Bharti, mother of the
informant and in that occurrence his sister Deepika Sharma also
received gun shot injury that crippled her left hand and only for
that reason the family members of her in-law’s house did not
liked her.
(c) The FIR further alleges that Deepika Sharma was
an eye witness of her mother’s killing in Bariarpur P.S. Case
No.9/2017 and therefore the agnates of the informant were
pressurizing Deepika not to give evidence in Court. Even her
husband tried to state her to give any evidence against
Bhubneshwar Sharma and Kundan Sharma but Deepika refused
to oblige them.
(d) On 15.11.2021 Deepika Sharma was killed in her
in-law’s house and just prior to it, on 14.11.2021, she had called
her another brother Deepak Sharma (on his Mobile
No.7004589626) and had complained against the members of
her in-law’s house as also Bhubneshwar Sharma, Kundan
Sharma and Shanti Devi fearing that they may kill her.
The petitioner is the younger brother of the husband
of the deceased. According to the learned counsel for the
petitioner he had no connection with the couple and was living
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17580 of 2022(2) dt.15-07-2022
3/4
away from them. He further submits that it has specifically been
narrated in the FIR that it was the husband of the deceased who
was pressurizing her not to stand up as a witness in a murder
case in which one of his relative was implicated as an accused.
He as such submits that only because he belongs to the said
family, he has been implicated in the case and is in jail since
17.11.2021 (as stated in para-6 of the bail application).
Taking into account the aforesaid fact that the
allegation has been made against the husband, the petitioner is
the brother-in-law of the deceased, charge-sheet stands
submitted and he is in jail since 17.11.2021 as also the fact that
he does not have any criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined
to grant him the privilege of bail.
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each in connection with Kasim Bazar
P.S. Case No.313/2021 to the satisfaction of learned Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Munger, subject to following conditions:
(i) one of the bailor