SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh
MD. ISLAM – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./17135/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17135 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2021 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District-

Madhepura

======================================================

MD. ISLAM S/o Late Badlu R/o Mohalla- Karauti Nahar Tola, Ward No. 14,

P.S.- Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Ashok Kumar Yadav

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH

SINGH

ORAL ORDER

3

25-07-2022

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove

defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of

four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for

the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of

regular bail in a case registered under sections 147, 148, 120B, 363

and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and co-accused

persons in connivance with one another are said to have kidnapped

and killed the son of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17135 of 2022(3) dt.25-07-2022

2/3

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the

petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

petitioner. There is no witness in this case. There is general and

omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already

been submitted in this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent as

stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The other co-accused persons

has already been granted bail by the Co-ordiante Bench vide order

dated 06.12.2021 in Criminal Misc. No. 54348 of 2021. The

petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of

the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the

petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on his

furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

A.C.J.M 1st Udakishunganj district-Madhepura/Sucessor Court, in

connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 167 of 2021.

The application stands allowed.

atul/-

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

U

T

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17135 of 2022(3) dt.25-07-2022

3/3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top