PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
SANDEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. REV. 288 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.288 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2020 Thana- MAGADH MEDICAL COLLEGE
District- Gaya
======================================================
XX
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Ram Narayan Rai, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
2
21-06-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.
Though the petitioner has given full description in the
application, it would be inappropriate to disclose his identity in
view of section 74 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection
of Children) Act, 2015. Thus, he is being referred to in the cause
title as XX.
The application has been preferred under the Juvenile
Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 against the
order dated 4.2.2021 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 59 of 2020 by the
learned Special Judge, Children Court, Gaya whereby the appeal
was dismissed affirming the order dated 23.11.2020 passed by
the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in Misc. Case No. 155 of 2020
arising out of Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 83 of 2020
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.288 of 2021(2) dt.21-06-2021
2/3
registered under sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.
As per allegation in the F.I.R., on secret information
having been received, a raid was conducted and on disclosure of
the petitioner, a pistol was recovered.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that
the allegation as levelled in the F.I.R. are false and incorrect and
the petitioner who was declared a Juvenile by order dated
22.5.2020 (Annexure-2) has been falsely implicated in the case.
He has been in custody since 4.5.2020 and has no criminal
antecedent.
The application is opposed by learned A.P.P. appearing
for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking
into consideration the petitioner having been declared a juvenile
by the above mentioned order and having remained in juvenile
home for over one year, the Court is inclined to allow the instant
application. The application is allowed and the order dated
4.2.2021 passed in Cr. Appeal (Juvenile) No. 69 of 2020 passed
by the learned Special Judge, Children Court, Gaya and the
order dated 23.11.2020 of the Juvenile Justice Board, Gaya in
Misc. Case No. 155 of 2020 are hereby set aside.
It is directed that on the undertaking given by his father,
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.288 of 2021(2) dt.21-06-2021
3/3
the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail in connection with
Magadh Medical P.S. Case No. 83 of 2020 on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.5,000/ (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Juvenile
Justice Board, Gaya.
Bibhash
(Partha Sarthy, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.