SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar
VIJAY MUKHIYA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. MISC./27357/2021



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27357 of 2021

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2021 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani

======================================================

1.

Vijay Mukhiya Son of Ram Lochan Mukhiya Resident of Village- Kerward

Lawa Tol, P.S.- Bisfi (Patauna O.P.), District- Madhubani.

2.

Dayanand Mukhiya @ Sadanand Mukhiya Son of Late Malhu Mukhiya

Resident of Village- Kerward Lawa Tol, P.S.- Bisfi (Patauna O.P.), District-

Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

ORAL ORDER

2

01-02-2022

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected

to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for

depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the

defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to

do so by the office.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

a case registered for the offences punishable under

Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27357 of 2021(2) dt.01-02-2022

2/3

Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks

permission to withdraw the petition with regard to

petitioner No. 2 since he has been arrested.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the petition with regard to

petitioner No. 2 namely Dayanand Mukhiya @ Sadanand

Mukhiya is permitted to be withdrawn.

There is recovery of 90 litres of Indian made

foreign liquor from the house of petitioner No. 2.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioner No. 1 that nothing has been recovered from

the possession of the petitioner. He was not

apprehended from the spot. The petitioner No. 1 has no

concern with the seized contraband. A statement has

been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner No. 1

has no criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let

the petitioner No. 1, above named, in the event of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27357 of 2021(2) dt.01-02-2022

3/3

arrest or surrender before the Court below within a

period of four weeks from today, be released on

anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount

each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions

Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani in

connection with Bisfi(Patauna O.P) P.S. Case No. 27 of

2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Shageer/-

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top