HIGH COURT OF PATNA
MD. FIROZ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
CR. APP (DB) 193/1996
['ASHUTOSH KUMAR', '', 'Kumari Pallavi', 'Manoj Kumar Pandey', 'Surendra Kishore Thakur', 'PP', '', 'Dilip kumar Sinha', 'DESH BANDHU ROY', 'ANIL KUMAR MISHRA', 'MD NURUL HODA']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.193 of 1996
(Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
8th May, 1996 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Saran
in Sessions Trial No. 1062/94)
======================================================
Md. Firoz, son of Md. Hanif Mian, resident of village Baharwa Gachhi, P.S.-
Nayagaon, District- Saran.
... ... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate
Mrs. Kumari Pallavi, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Bipin Kumar, APP
For the Informant
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)
Date : 30-09-2022
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P.
for the State who has been assisted by the learned counsel
appearing for the informant.
2. The present criminal appeal was preferred in the year
1996 i.e., 26 years ago, against the judgment of conviction and
order of sentence dated 8th May, 1996 passed by the 1st
Additional Sessions Judge, Saran in Sessions Trial No. 1062/94
(arising out of Nayagaon P.S. Case No. 29 of 1994), whereby and
whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 302
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.193 of 1996 dt.30-09-2022
2/15
of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and
sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302 of
Indian Penal Code and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for
three years under Section 27 of the Arms Act with direction that
both the sentences shall concurrently. The Trial court has further
ordered that the period of custody undergone by the appellant
during trial shall be set off from the period of sentence under the
provisions of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C.
3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that Md. Mukhtar gave
his fardbeyan before the S.I. A.P.Singh of Nayagaon Police
Station on 11.04.1994 at 2.30 a.m. at Sadar Hospital, Hajipur
wherein the informant stated that he works as Mistri in Hotel
Republic, Exhibition Road, Patna and on 10.04.94 being Sunday
he went to his village home and on 10.04.94 itself, in the
evening he along with his cousin Abdul Gaffar (deceased) had
gone to Nayabazar to take tea and purchase domestic articles and
remained there for half an hour. Thereafter, the informant along
with Abdul Gaffar, who was having his bicycle, were returning
home in the evening at 7 p.m. When they arrived at railway
crossing near the road turning towards village, the deceased was
about 6-7 feet in front of informant and the informant saw three
persons coming from east who came near to them about a
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.193 of 1996 dt.30-09-2022
3/15
distance of 8-10 feet out of whom the informant identified only
Md. Firoz (appellant) in the flash light of a three cell torch which
he was holding at the time of said incident. The informant further
stated that he was not able to identify other two persons. The
informant further stated that the appellant fired from his revolver
at Abdul Gaffar (deceased) on which the informant chased them
but Md. Firoz (appellant) along with two others fled away
towards east. Abdul Gaffar (deceased) sustained gun shot injury
on his head due to which he fell down. The informant raised
hulla on which Shahid Mian (P.W.5), Rafique Mian (P.W.1) and
many other people arrived at the place of occurrence. At that time,
Abdul Gaffar (deceased) told the Informant that the appellant had
shot him. The informant alo