Advocates:
['Sudama Singh', '', 'RAJANI KANT SINGH', 'GP', '', 'Chandra Mauli Chaurasia', 'Shivadani Singh', 'NARESH KUMAR MEHTA', 'SUBASH CHANDRA YADAV']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10656 of 1997

===========================================================

1. Raj Narayan Yadav, son of Shri Sheonandan Yadav

2. Anirudh Yadav, son of Shri Matar Yadav

3. Nakchhedi Yadav, son of Late Deodhari Yadav

4. Dhananjay Yadav, son of Shri Meghu Yadav

5. Bhagwan Pandey, son of Late Yaddu Pandey

All residents of Village Niyajipur (Lal Singh Ke Dera), Post office Gangauli,

P.S. Simri, District Buxar

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Charge Officer, Arra, Bhojpur

3. The Assistant Settlement Officer, Arra, Bhojpur

4. Shyam Bahadur Yadav, son of Late Ganesh Yadav

5. Ram Baran Yadav, son of Late Shri Kishan Yadav

Nos. 4 and 5 are residents of Villae Tilak Rai Ka Hata, Post office Barka

Rajpur, P.S. Simri, District Buxar

.... .... Respondents

===========================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. SUDAMA SINGH

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh

For the Respondent/s : Mr. T. Khan,AC toSC 12

Mr. Subhash Chandra Yadav

Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta

===========================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH

ORAL JUDGMENT

Date: 30-07-2015

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. After some argument learned Counsel for the parties have

jointly submitted that the issues arising in this writ application are directly

dependant upon determination of disputed questions of fact which cannot

be done in the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Learned Counsel for the parties have further submitted that without going

into merits, this writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the

aggrieved party to approach the Civil Court for redressal of his grievance.

3. In view of the aforesaid submission and stand by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10656 of 1997 dt.30-07-2015

2

learned Counsel for both the parties without going into the merits, this

writ application is disposed of with liberty to the aggrieved party to seek

redressal of their grievances in accordance with law before the Civil

Court of competent jurisdiction.

Snkumar/-

(V. Nath, J.)

U