SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH PATNA
Jagdish Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Mahima Pandey – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVISION No.24 of 2020

======================================================

Jagdish Pandey, Son of Late Ram Sakal Pandey, Resident of Village- Ameya,

P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Dr. Mahima Pandey, Son of Late Ramsakal Pandey, resident of Village-

Ameya, P.O. Mahuawan, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj and 8 Lessinghom

Road, Widness, Cheshire WA 89 FU, England.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No.5, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA

ORAL ORDER

7

14-09-2023

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This Civil Revision application has been filed

against the order dated 28.01.2020 passed in Partition Suit No.

144 of 2012 by learned Sub-ordinate Judge-IX, Gopalganj

whereby and whereunder the application of petitioner/defendant

seeking rejection of plaint has been rejected.

3. The brief facts of the case, according to the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top