SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha
PRAMOD KUMAR @ PRAMOD MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./21881/2022



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21881 of 2022

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2011 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur

======================================================

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Mahto Son of Rajendra Mahto R/O Village - Siho,

Repura, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

ORAL ORDER

4

05-09-2022

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period

of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sakra P.S.

Case No. 102 of 2011 registered for the offence under Sections

302, 328, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in

custody since 15.02.2021.

The allegation against the petitioner is to commit

murder of his wife, after 14 years of marriage for non-

fulfillment of demand of Rs.3 lakhs, for the purpose of business,

by administering poison.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21881 of 2022(4) dt.05-09-2022

2/3

submitted that death of wife of the petitioner is due to suicide

out of family frustration. It is submitted that informant is not the

eye wintess of the occurrence and entire allegation is based

upon suspicion. It is submitted that petitioner informed the

informant about the occurrence and made request to join the last

rites also. It is also submitted that after obtaining the consent,

last rites was performed and, admittedly, this is not a case,

where post mortem was conducted upon the deceased. It is

further submitted that F.I.R., even, on its face suggest that

allegation of administering poison is very much general and

omnibus. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that

petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and, moreover,

investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has

been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with

the evidence.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, while

opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded that allegation of

administering poison is general and omnibus, as per F.I.R.

In view of the facts and circumstances as mentioned

above, as allegation regarding administering poison, after 14

years of marriage, is appearing very much general and omnibus,

from the bare perusal of the F.I.R., coupled with the fact that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21881 of 2022(4) dt.05-09-2022

3/3

chargesheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above

named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with

Sakra P.S. Case No. 102 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate-XII, Muzaffarpur/concerned Court, subject

to the conditions as laid down u/s 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.

Ankit/-

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top