HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha
PRAMOD KUMAR @ PRAMOD MAHTO – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./21881/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21881 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2011 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Mahto Son of Rajendra Mahto R/O Village - Siho,
Repura, P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
4
05-09-2022
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period
of four weeks from today.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sakra P.S.
Case No. 102 of 2011 registered for the offence under Sections
302, 328, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in
custody since 15.02.2021.
The allegation against the petitioner is to commit
murder of his wife, after 14 years of marriage for non-
fulfillment of demand of Rs.3 lakhs, for the purpose of business,
by administering poison.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21881 of 2022(4) dt.05-09-2022
2/3
submitted that death of wife of the petitioner is due to suicide
out of family frustration. It is submitted that informant is not the
eye wintess of the occurrence and entire allegation is based
upon suspicion. It is submitted that petitioner informed the
informant about the occurrence and made request to join the last
rites also. It is also submitted that after obtaining the consent,
last rites was performed and, admittedly, this is not a case,
where post mortem was conducted upon the deceased. It is
further submitted that F.I.R., even, on its face suggest that
allegation of administering poison is very much general and
omnibus. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that
petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and, moreover,
investigation in this case is complete for which chargesheet has
been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with
the evidence.
Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, while
opposing the prayer of bail, fairly conceded that allegation of
administering poison is general and omnibus, as per F.I.R.
In view of the facts and circumstances as mentioned
above, as allegation regarding administering poison, after 14
years of marriage, is appearing very much general and omnibus,
from the bare perusal of the F.I.R., coupled with the fact that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21881 of 2022(4) dt.05-09-2022
3/3
chargesheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above
named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with
Sakra P.S. Case No. 102 of 2011 on furnishing bail bond of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate-XII, Muzaffarpur/concerned Court, subject
to the conditions as laid down u/s 437(3) of the Cr.P.C.
Ankit/-
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
U
T