SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar
Mayakant Mishra – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar and Ors – Respondent
CR. MISC./57227/2015



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57227 of 2015

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-537 Year-2014 Thana- SAUR BAZAR District- Saharsa

======================================================

Mayakant Mishra son of Late Budho Mishra Resident of Mohalla- Gangjala,

Ward No. 19, P.S. Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors null null

2.

North Bihar Power Holding Company through its Managing Director,

Vidyut Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

3.

Rajesh Kumar Bharti, Son of Deo Narain Ram Resident of village-

Diwanganj, P.S. Raghopur, District- Supaul at present Junior Electrical

Engineer, Electrical Supply Section, Saur Bazar Rural, District- Saharsa.

4.

null null null

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, Advocate

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, AAPP

For the O.P. No. 2

:

Mr. Anand Ojha, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

ORAL ORDER

4

15-01-2021

This is an application seeking quashing of the

FIR of Saur Bazar P.S. Case No. 537 of 2017 dated

03.12.2014 instituted for the offence under Section 379

of the Indian Penal Code.

On 04.11.2020. this Court had called for a

report about the stage of the case from the court below.

The report has been received and it is kept at ‘Flag X’. It

appears that charge sheet in this case has already been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57227 of 2015(4) dt.15-01-2021

2/2

submitted whereafter cognizance has been taken.

An affidavit also has been filed pursuant to the

order of this Court by the learned counsel for the

opposite party no. 2 intimating this Court about the

stage of the case.

In that view of the matter, this petition has

become infructuous.

The petition stands dismissed as having become

infructuous.

krishna/-

(Ashutosh Kumar, J)

U

T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top