PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh
GEETA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./26584/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26584 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2019 Thana- DARIHAT District- Rohtas
======================================================
1.
GEETA DEVI wife of Premchand Singh Resident of Village - Dharahara,
Police Station - Darihat, District - Rohtas.
2.
Sandeep Kumar Son of Premchand Singh Resident of Village - Dharahara,
Police Station - Darihat, District - Rohtas.
3.
Sushil Kumar Son of Premchand Singh Resident of Village - Dharahara,
Police Station - Darihat, District - Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Rajani Kant Singh
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.G
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
4
25-01-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case
registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 447, 323, 324, 325,
307, 354, 504, 506, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾
of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegedly, while the informant along with his family
members was constructing his building through brick, the
accused persons having armed with Lathi, Danda, Gadansa,
Fasuli and Tangi came there and having started abusing,
prevented the informant from constructing the building, as a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26584 of 2020(4) dt.25-01-2021
2/3
result of which, on the order of one Premchand Singh, his wife,
daughter and sons, assaulted them. It is alleged that in the
incident, injury was caused to the informant side. It is also
alleged that the younger daughter-in-law of the informant was
assaulted and her clothes were torn out.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there
is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the
petitioners. The petitioners have been falsely implicated in the
present case. The petitioner No. 1 is a lady. She is alleged to
have assaulted Rajmuni Devi. No grievous injury was found on
the parts of the injured by the doctor. The injury was found to
be superficial in nature. So far petitioner Nos. 2 & 3 are
concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation against the
petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against them. There
is case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is
alleged to have taken place between the parties. The injury on
the side of the accused has not been explained by the
prosecution. The prosecution has not come with clean hands.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners
are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the
case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26584 of 2020(4) dt.25-01-2021
3/3
surrender before the learned court below within a period of eight
weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing
bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri C. K. Verma,
learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Dehri-on-Sone, District-
Rohtas in connection with Darihat P.S. Case No. 81 of 2019
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of
the Code of Criminal Procedure.
A.K.V.//-
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.